Gonzalez v. J&G Italian Restaurant Corp.
- Robert Lehrburger
- 1:24-cv-09405
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Gonzalez v. J&G Italian Restaurant Corp., Judge Lehrburger approved the FLSA settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Eduardo Gonzalez and J&G Italian Restaurant Corp. and the other defendants; the settlement resolved the entire case.
What happened
Eduardo Gonzalez sued J&G Italian Restaurant Corp. and other defendants for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The parties jointly asked the court to approve their settlement.
Judge Lehrburger reviewed the revised settlement and considered the risks and costs of continuing the case, possible recovery, attorney’s fees, and potential fraud or collusion. He found the agreement fair and reasonable, noting that it had no confidentiality restrictions, released only wage-and-hour claims, and included a mutual non-disparagement provision that allowed truthful statements.
The court approved the settlement and, as Judge Lehrburger ordered, dismissed and discontinued the entire case with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement. The clerk was directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
The detailed version
- Gonzalez v. J&G Italian Restaurant Corp. · No. 1:24-cv-09405
- Robert Lehrburger
- June 9, 2025
Background
Eduardo Gonzalez brought an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a federal wage-and-hour law, and the New York Labor Law against J&G Italian Restaurant Corp. and other defendants. The parties submitted a joint request for approval of their settlement agreement.
Settlement Review
The court explained that federal courts must review FLSA settlements to determine whether they are fair and reasonable and resulted from arm’s-length negotiations rather than employer overreaching. The court reviewed the fully executed settlement agreement after requesting revisions and considered the prior proceedings, the risks, burdens, and costs of continuing the case, the possible recovery, the bargaining process, attorney’s fees, and the possibility of fraud or collusion.
The court noted that the agreement contained no confidentiality restrictions, that its release was narrowly limited to wage-and-hour claims, and that the attorney’s fees fell within a fair and reasonable range. The agreement also included a mutual non-disparagement provision that did not prohibit truthful statements about the case or the underlying facts.
Ruling
Judge Robert W. Lehrburger found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it. Because the case was resolved by settlement, the court dismissed and discontinued it in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party except as provided in the settlement agreement. The clerk was directed to terminate all motions and deadlines and close the case.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.