Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC v. Deloitte Consulting, LLP
- P. Castel
- 1:24-cv-09013
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Multi-State Partnership for Prevention v. Deloitte, MSPP asked to seal trade-secret details; Judge Castel’s ruling is not included in the provided text.
Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC and Deloitte Consulting, LLP; the requested sealing would also limit public access to specified portions of MSPP’s third amended complaint.
What happened
Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC v. Deloitte Consulting, LLP concerns MSPP’s request to keep limited portions of its third amended complaint from public view. The provided document is a letter motion, not a court ruling.
MSPP says the redacted material identifies its trade secrets and other confidential information that it alleges Deloitte misappropriated. It argues that disclosure could destroy the information’s value and give competitors an advantage, while the public interest in the specific details is limited.
The letter asks the court to seal only those limited portions and to publicly file a redacted complaint. Judge P. Kevin Castel’s decision on the request is not included in the provided text.
The detailed version
- Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC v. Deloitte Consulting, LLP · No. 1:24-cv-09013
- P. Castel
- June 9, 2025
Document and posture
The provided document is a May 19, 2025 letter motion filed by Multi-State Partnership for Prevention, LLC (MSPP). It asks the court to seal limited portions of MSPP’s third amended complaint. The text does not include a court order deciding the request.
Background
MSPP’s lawsuit alleges, among other things, that Deloitte misappropriated MSPP’s trade secrets and confidential information. The letter states that the court had previously allowed MSPP to amend its complaint and had postponed an initial pretrial conference until after an anticipated motion to dismiss was decided.
Request to seal
MSPP asks to file the third amended complaint partly under seal while filing a redacted version publicly. It says the redactions are minimal and necessary to protect trade secrets, including confidential information forming part of what MSPP calls a combination trade secret. According to MSPP, public disclosure could eliminate the information’s value and allow business competitors to gain an advantage. MSPP also states that it is not seeking to seal publicly available information.
Disposition
The provided text contains MSPP’s request and its supporting reasons but does not state whether Judge P. Kevin Castel granted, denied, or otherwise decided the letter motion. No ruling on the sealing request can be determined from this text.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.