Hamilton v. Eischen
- Patrick Schiltz
- 0:25-cv-01293
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Hamilton v. Eischen, Chief Judge Schiltz adopted the recommendation and dismissed the petition with prejudice.
Jesse Ray Hamilton’s petition was dismissed with prejudice; the opinion does not state any further effect on the respondents.
What happened
Hamilton v. Eischen involved a petition filed by Jesse Ray Hamilton against B. Eischen and FPC Duluth.
The court received a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. No party objected, so the court reviewed it for clear error.
Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz found no clear error, adopted the recommendation, and dismissed the petition with prejudice. The opinion does not explain the petition’s underlying claims.
The detailed version
- Hamilton v. Eischen · No. 0:25-cv-01293
- Patrick Schiltz
- June 11, 2025
Background
Jesse Ray Hamilton filed a petition against B. Eischen and FPC Duluth. The opinion does not describe the petition’s underlying claims or the relief Hamilton sought.
Report and Recommendation
United States Magistrate Judge John F. Docherty issued a Report and Recommendation. No party objected. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the court therefore reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s analysis.
Ruling
Chief Judge Patrick J. Schiltz found no clear error. The court adopted the Report and Recommendation and dismissed the petition with prejudice, meaning the petition may not be refiled. The court directed that judgment be entered accordingly.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.