Hunt v. Eischen
- Nancy Brasel
- 0:25-cv-01986
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 1
In Hunt v. Eischen, Judge Brasel accepted the recommendation, denied Hunt’s petition, and dismissed the action with prejudice.
Christopher Hunt’s petition was denied, and his action was dismissed with prejudice. The opinion does not identify the underlying claim or explain the effect on any other person.
What happened
In Hunt v. Eischen, the court considered a report and recommendation from Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois concerning Christopher Hunt’s petition.
No party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error. It found no clear error.
Judge Nancy E. Brasel accepted the recommendation, denied Hunt’s petition, and dismissed the action with prejudice. The court directed that judgment be entered.
The detailed version
- Hunt v. Eischen · No. 0:25-cv-01986
- Nancy Brasel
- June 16, 2025
Background
Christopher Hunt filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court received a May 15, 2025 report and recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois.
Review
No party objected to the report and recommendation. The court therefore reviewed it for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The court found no clear error and stated that its decision was based on the files, records, and proceedings in the matter.
Ruling
The court accepted the report and recommendation, denied the petition, and dismissed the action with prejudice. The court also directed that judgment be entered. The opinion does not explain the underlying basis for denying the petition.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.