Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2025

McCormick v. Tribune Company

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04750
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In McCormick v. Tribune Company, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because McCormick had not obtained required permission to proceed without paying fees.

Who this affects

Joanna Canzoneri McCormick and the other plaintiffs, whose action was dismissed without prejudice; the defendants were not required to litigate the underlying claims in this order.

What happened

In McCormick v. Tribune Company, Joanna Canzoneri McCormick sought to bring a civil action while proceeding without paying filing fees up front.

A 2011 order had barred her from filing any new civil action in the Southern District of New York without first obtaining the court’s permission. She had not requested that permission for this action.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because McCormick did not comply with the earlier order. Judge Swain also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, finding that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
McCormick v. Tribune Company · No. 1:25-cv-04750
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 16, 2025

Background

Joanna Canzoneri McCormick and other plaintiffs sued Tribune Company and other defendants. McCormick sought to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without prepaying the filing fee.

Prior Filing Restriction

On December 8, 2011, District Judge Loretta A. Preska ordered that McCormick could not file any new civil action in the Southern District of New York without first obtaining the court’s permission. In this action, McCormick had not requested that permission.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 because McCormick failed to comply with Judge Preska’s earlier order. The opinion did not address the underlying claims against Tribune Company or the other defendants.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.