METAx LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
- Louis Stanton
- 1:22-cv-06125
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In METAx v. Meta Platforms, Judge Stanton granted two executives relief from testifying and allowed limited sealing of deposition excerpts.
METAx LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg, and Nicola Mendelsohn; the order also limits public access to specified pages of two exhibits.
What happened
In METAx LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc., Meta Platforms asked the court to prevent depositions of Mark Zuckerberg and Nicola Mendelsohn and to seal portions of two exhibits. The exhibits were deposition excerpts submitted in connection with that discovery dispute.
The court granted Zuckerberg’s and Mendelsohn’s applications for relief from testifying, but allowed METAx to seek their depositions again if other witnesses could not provide the requested information. The court also ruled that only the specified pages of Exhibits 2 and 3 could be sealed.
Judge Louis L. Stanton’s order limited sealing to the listed pages and left the rest available to the public. The motion argued that the redacted material contained confidential, commercially sensitive information about Meta Platforms’ internal business operations, branding, and strategy.
The detailed version
- METAx LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-06125
- Louis Stanton
- June 18, 2025
Background
Meta Platforms, Inc. asked the court to prevent depositions of its Chief Executive Officer, Mark Zuckerberg, and its Head of Global Business Group, Nicola Mendelsohn. The request concerned depositions seeking information related to METAx LLC’s claims. Meta Platforms also asked to seal portions of Exhibits 2 and 3, which contained deposition excerpts submitted in connection with the discovery dispute.
Rulings
The court granted Zuckerberg’s and Mendelsohn’s applications for relief from testifying. The order allowed METAx to reapply for their depositions if the information it sought could not be obtained from other witnesses.
The court also ruled that only these portions could be sealed:
- Pages 34–37 and 49–53 of Exhibit 2. - Pages 46, 48, 108–110, 152–154, and 188–189 of Exhibit 3.
The order did not authorize sealing of other portions of the exhibits.
Sealing Request
The submission supporting the sealing request argued that the specified portions contained confidential, nonpublic, and commercially sensitive information about Meta Platforms’ internal discussions, business operations, organizational structure, processes for developing and introducing brands or trademarks, branding strategy, and company goals and vision. It argued that disclosure could give competitors insight that could be used to compete unfairly.
The submission also argued that the exhibits were discovery materials rather than documents directly used to decide the merits of the case. It relied on the legal standard that sealing must be narrowly tailored and supported by specific findings, and it argued that the parties’ protective order reinforced the confidentiality designation.
Disposition
Judge Louis L. Stanton granted the two applications for relief from testifying, subject to the stated opportunity for METAx to reapply. He also limited sealing to the listed pages of Exhibits 2 and 3.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.