Verificient Technologies, Inc. v. Dutta
- Gregory Woods
- 1:24-cv-09487
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Verificient Technologies v. Dutta, Judge Woods entered judgment for Verificient for $483,681.98 plus interest.
Verificient Technologies, Inc. received a judgment for $483,681.98 plus stated prejudgment and post-judgment interest. Apratim Dutta was subject to that judgment. The order also denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee.
What happened
Verificient Technologies, Inc. v. Dutta concerns a judgment entered for Verificient Technologies, Inc. against Apratim Dutta. The judgment says it followed the court’s June 20, 2025 Memorandum Opinion and Order, but that memorandum is not included here.
The judgment awards Verificient $483,681.98, plus $65,833.76 in interest calculated at 9 percent per year from December 16, 2023, through June 20, 2025. It also provides for additional interest after judgment at the rate set by federal law.
Judge Gregory Woods’s court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The judgment was entered on June 20, 2025.
The detailed version
- Verificient Technologies, Inc. v. Dutta · No. 1:24-cv-09487
- Gregory Woods
- June 20, 2025
Judgment
The court entered judgment in favor of Verificient Technologies, Inc. and against Apratim Dutta. The judgment states that it was entered for the reasons given in the court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order dated June 20, 2025. That memorandum is not part of the provided text, so the underlying claims and the court’s reasoning cannot be summarized from this document alone.
Amount Awarded
The judgment awards Verificient $483,681.98. It adds prejudgment interest at 9 percent per year from December 16, 2023, through the date of the judgment, for a stated total interest amount of $65,833.76. It also provides for post-judgment interest at the rate established by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a).
Appeal-Filing-Fee Ruling
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the filing fee. The judgment was dated June 20, 2025, in New York, New York, and Judge Gregory Woods is identified as the presiding judge in the supplied case information.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.