Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 20, 2025

Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services Corp

Judge
Philip Halpern
Docket
7:24-cv-04418
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services, Judge Halpern granted the parties’ request to extend their settlement-filing deadline to July 10, 2025.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and defendants, whose deadline to file their settlement agreement for court approval was extended to July 10, 2025.

What happened

In Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services Corp., the parties jointly asked for more time to submit their settlement agreement for court approval. The existing deadline was June 23, 2025.

The court granted a three-week extension, moving the deadline to July 10, 2025. The parties said they needed time to finalize and sign the agreement before filing it.

Judge Philip M. Halpern also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the letter motion listed at docket entry 31.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mobley v. Daisy Floral Services Corp · No. 7:24-cv-04418
Judge
Philip Halpern
Date
June 20, 2025

Background

Plaintiff’s counsel and defense counsel jointly requested a three-week extension, until July 10, 2025, to file the parties’ settlement agreement for court approval. The parties’ application was due June 23, 2025, under an earlier court order. The request stated that the parties needed additional time to finalize the agreement’s language and obtain the parties’ signatures. It also stated that there had been no earlier requests to extend that deadline.

Ruling

The court granted the application. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the letter motion pending at docket entry 31. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms or make any ruling on the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.