Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
D. Minn.Procedural orderFiled June 24, 2025

Dillon B. v. Bisignano

Judge
Laura Provinzino
Docket
0:25-cv-00374
Court
U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
Pages
4
Social SecurityFee Petition
In one sentence

In Dillon B. v. Bisignano, Judge Provinzino granted Dillon B.’s motion for $852.60 in Equal Access to Justice Act attorneys’ fees.

Who this affects

Dillon B., who received an award of $852.60 in attorneys’ fees; the Commissioner of Social Security, whose opposition was not presented; and the United States, because the award may be offset against qualifying pre-existing debts owed by Dillon B.

What happened

Dillon B. v. Bisignano involved Dillon B.’s request for attorneys’ fees after the court sent his disability-benefits case back to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings. The Commissioner did not oppose the request.

The court found that Dillon B. qualified for fees because the remand made him a prevailing party and the Commissioner did not argue that the government’s position was substantially justified. The court also found the requested hourly rate and time reasonable.

Judge Laura M. Provinzino granted the motion and awarded Dillon B. $852.60 under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The award is payable to Dillon B. as the litigant and may be reduced to satisfy qualifying debts owed to the United States.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dillon B. v. Bisignano · No. 0:25-cv-00374
Judge
Laura M. Provinzino
Date
June 24, 2025

Background

On May 12, 2025, the court granted the parties’ agreement to send Dillon B.’s action back to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Dillon B. then moved for $852.60 in attorneys’ fees. Frank Bisignano, the Commissioner of Social Security, did not oppose the request.

Legal standard and analysis

The Equal Access to Justice Act, or EAJA, permits an award of attorneys’ fees to a prevailing plaintiff in an action seeking judicial review of a denial of disability benefits unless the government’s position was substantially justified or special circumstances would make an award unjust. The court determined that Dillon B. was a prevailing party because a sentence-four remand qualifies for that status. Because the Commissioner did not argue that the government’s position was substantially justified, the court found Dillon B. entitled to an EAJA award.

The court then evaluated whether the requested amount was reasonable. It accepted the requested hourly rate of $243.60, which was based on a cost-of-living adjustment to the EAJA’s $125 statutory rate. The court also found the claimed work reasonable and concluded that an award of $852.60 was appropriate.

Disposition

Judge Laura M. Provinzino ordered that Dillon B.’s motion for attorneys’ fees was GRANTED. The court awarded Dillon B. $852.60 under the EAJA. Under the order, the award is payable to Dillon B. as the litigant and is subject to offset for any pre-existing debts Dillon B. may owe to the United States. The court directed that judgment be entered accordingly.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.