Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 26, 2025

AA, by and through her parents BB and CC v. City of New York

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:25-cv-00752
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
DiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In AA v. City of New York, Judge Gorenstein granted plaintiffs’ motion to compel defendants to produce a privilege log by July 11, 2025.

Who this affects

The order affects AA, by and through her parents BB and CC, and the other plaintiffs, who sought information to challenge privilege claims, as well as the City of New York and the other defendants, who must produce a privilege log by July 11, 2025.

What happened

AA, by and through her parents BB and CC, and other plaintiffs asked the court to require the City of New York and other defendants to provide a privilege log for withheld materials.

The defendants argued that the materials were part of a single ongoing file that included other active case files. Their response focused mainly on whether the materials were privileged and asked the court to review them privately before requiring a log.

The court granted the motion to compel and ordered defendants to produce the privilege log by July 11, 2025. Judge Gorenstein said federal rules and the court’s local rule require a privilege log and explained that it must give plaintiffs enough information to challenge the privilege claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
AA, by and through her parents BB and CC v. City of New York · No. 1:25-cv-00752
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
June 26, 2025

Background

The plaintiffs applied for an order requiring the defendants to produce a privilege log. A privilege log identifies documents or materials withheld from discovery because a party claims they are protected from disclosure, and provides information that allows the opposing party to evaluate or challenge that claim.

The defendants opposed the application. Their response focused primarily on the merits of their privilege claims and requested that the court conduct a private review of the withheld documents. The defendants also stated that the materials consisted of “a single ongoing file that incorporates other active case files.”

Court’s Analysis

The court stated that producing a privilege log is mandatory under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(e)(2)(A)(ii), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(A)(ii), and Local Civil Rule 26.2. The court noted that the defendants cited no supporting case for their position that they should not have to produce a log. It also said the defendants’ explanation about the files did not show why they could not comply with the applicable rules.

The court declined to treat the defendants’ request for private review of the documents as a substitute for producing a privilege log. It emphasized that the purpose of the log is to provide plaintiffs with the information needed to challenge the defendants’ privilege claims. The court also encouraged defendants to consult Local Civil Rule 26.2(c), which describes efficient ways to provide information about privilege claims.

Ruling

The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of a privilege log. It ordered the defendants to produce the log on or before July 11, 2025. The order addressed discovery procedure and did not decide whether the withheld materials were actually protected by privilege.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.