Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 27, 2025

Quinones v. Biolife Plasma Services Inc

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-03855
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

Quinones v. Biolife Plasma Services Inc.: Judge Swain dismissed the complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim, and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

The plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, ending the case as reflected in the judgment. The plaintiff was also denied permission to appeal without prepaying the filing fee.

What happened

In Quinones v. Biolife Plasma Services Inc., the court considered a complaint that had been filed without prepaying the filing fee under a federal statute allowing that procedure.

The judgment states that the court dismissed the complaint because it failed to state a claim for relief and was frivolous. The court also entered judgment dismissing the case.

Judge Swain’s court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied the plaintiff permission to appeal without prepaying the filing fee.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Quinones v. Biolife Plasma Services Inc · No. 1:25-cv-03855
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 27, 2025

Background

The plaintiff filed a complaint against Biolife Plasma Services Inc. and other defendants without prepaying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The judgment states that the court’s reasons were set out in an order dated June 25, 2025. That order is not included in the provided text.

Court’s ruling

The court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted and as frivolous, citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A dismissal for failure to state a claim means the court found that the complaint did not adequately allege a legal basis for relief. The judgment states that the case was dismissed.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied the plaintiff permission to appeal without prepaying the filing fee. The judgment was entered on June 27, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.