Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 27, 2025

Perelman v. Department of Treasury

Judge
Ho
Docket
1:25-cv-04702
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Perelman v. Department of Treasury, Judge Ho ordered U.S. Marshals Service to serve the complaint after allowing Perelman to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Mark A. Perelman, the Clerk of Court, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the U.S. Department of the Treasury are affected. The Clerk and Marshals Service must carry out service, and Perelman must monitor the service deadline and report address changes.

What happened

Mark A. Perelman sued the U.S. Department of the Treasury, alleging discrimination and retaliation based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and disability under several federal, state, and city laws. The court had already allowed him to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Because Perelman was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court ordered the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to handle service of the lawsuit. The Clerk must issue a summons and prepare the required service paperwork. The court said the service deadline is 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Dale E. Ho also directed the Clerk to mail Perelman an information package. The order did not decide whether Perelman’s discrimination or retaliation claims were valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perelman v. Department of Treasury · No. 1:25-cv-04702
Judge
Ho
Date
June 27, 2025

Background

Mark A. Perelman brought this action against the U.S. Department of the Treasury under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. He alleges that the Department discriminated and retaliated against him based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, and disability.

The court had previously granted Perelman permission to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning he could proceed without prepaying court fees. In such cases, the court and the U.S. Marshals Service can handle service of the summons and complaint.

Service Order

The court instructed the Clerk of Court to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form for the Department of the Treasury, identify service on the United States, issue a summons, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve the defendant. The opinion lists service addresses for the United States, the Department of the Treasury, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York.

The court explained that the usual 90-day service period runs from the filing of the complaint, but Perelman could not have served the complaint before the court reviewed it and ordered the summons issued. The court therefore extended the service period until 90 days after any summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Perelman should request more time. He must also notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court may dismiss the action if he does not do so.

Disposition

The court ordered the Clerk to issue the summons, complete the service form, and deliver the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. It also directed the Clerk to mail Perelman an information package. The order addressed service only; it did not decide the merits of Perelman’s discrimination or retaliation claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.