Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 27, 2025

Williams v. SBB Broadway 922, LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-05342
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Williams v. SBB Broadway 922, LLC, Judge Rochon ordered settlement talks and a joint status letter, without deciding standing.

Who this affects

The plaintiff, Jeffery Williams, and the defendants, SBB Broadway 922, LLC d/b/a/ Sushi by Scratch and Broadway 922 Enterprises LLC, must comply with the settlement-discussion and joint-letter requirements.

What happened

In Williams v. SBB Broadway 922, LLC, the court ordered the parties to meet for at least one hour within 30 days after the summons and complaint are served. They must make a good-faith effort to settle and discuss whether Williams has standing to bring the case.

If they cannot settle, the parties must discuss whether court-connected mediation or a settlement conference with a magistrate judge would be useful. Within 45 days after service, they must file a joint letter stating whether they settled and, if not, requesting mediation, a magistrate-judge settlement conference, or an initial status conference.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued this settlement and case-management order on June 27, 2025. The order did not decide whether Williams has standing or resolve the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. SBB Broadway 922, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-05342
Judge
Rochon
Date
June 27, 2025

Order

The court ordered Jeffery Williams and SBB Broadway 922, LLC, doing business as Sushi by Scratch, and Broadway 922 Enterprises LLC, to meet and confer for at least one hour within 30 days after service of the summons and complaint. The parties must make a good-faith effort to settle the action.

Standing Discussion

The court directed the parties to consider whether Williams has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing—the requirement that a plaintiff be legally entitled to bring the case. The order cited Second Circuit decisions concerning standing but did not decide the issue.

Further Deadlines

If the parties cannot settle, they must discuss whether additional settlement discussions through the court's mediation program or before a magistrate judge would be productive. Within 15 additional days, or 45 days after service of the summons and complaint, the parties must submit a joint letter stating whether they settled. If they did not settle, the letter must request either mediation or a magistrate-judge settlement conference, while indicating a preference, or request that the court hold an initial status conference.

Disposition

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued the order on June 27, 2025. It is a settlement and case-management order; it does not resolve the standing issue or the merits of the parties' claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.