Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 1, 2025

Gioliver v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09627
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureCivil Rights
In one sentence

In Gioliver v. City of New York, Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

Tineo Gioliver’s action against the City of New York and the other named defendants was dismissed. The opinion does not provide enough information to identify the claims or explain the practical effect beyond the dismissal and the appeal certification.

What happened

In Gioliver v. City of New York, Tineo Gioliver sued the City of New York and other defendants. The judgment does not explain the claims or the events underlying the case.

The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in its June 27, 2025, order, which is not included in the provided opinion. It also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment on July 1, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gioliver v. Otis Bantum Correctional Facility · No. 1:24-cv-09627
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 1, 2025

Disposition

The court dismissed the action “for the reasons stated in” its June 27, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided opinion, so the basis for dismissal and whether the court reached the merits cannot be determined from this text.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The opinion cites the rule that an appellant acts in good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the civil judgment dated July 1, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.