Pena de la Rosa v. Lovely Beauty 167 Corp.
- Sarah Netburn
- 1:25-cv-00998
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Pena de la Rosa v. Lovely Beauty 167 Corp., Judge Netburn approved a fair settlement and dismissed the Fair Labor Standards Act case with prejudice.
Sandra Mariel Pena de la Rosa and the defendants in the action.
What happened
Pena de la Rosa v. Lovely Beauty 167 Corp. was a Fair Labor Standards Act case brought by Sandra Mariel Pena de la Rosa against Lovely Beauty 167 Corp. and other defendants.
The parties agreed to settlement terms in principle and submitted their proposed settlement for the court’s review. The court found that the settlement was fair and reasonable.
Judge Sarah Netburn approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice, meaning the case was ended and could not be refiled.
The detailed version
- Pena de la Rosa v. Lovely Beauty 167 Corp. · No. 1:25-cv-00998
- Sarah Netburn
- July 1, 2025
Background
This was a case under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Sandra Mariel Pena de la Rosa was the plaintiff, and Lovely Beauty 167 Corp. and other defendants were named as defendants.
Settlement Review
The parties agreed to settlement terms in principle and submitted a proposed settlement for the court’s review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, a decision cited in the order.
Ruling
Judge Sarah Netburn determined that the proposed settlement was fair and reasonable. The court approved the settlement and dismissed the action with prejudice.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.