Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 1, 2025

Great American Insurance Company v. Simpson

Judge
Vyskocil
Docket
1:25-cv-02375
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Great American Insurance Company v. Simpson, Judge Vyskocil remanded the case because the defendants did not all consent to removal.

Who this affects

The case was returned to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, affecting Great American Insurance Company, Jeffrey Simpson, Offit Kurman, Arch Real Estate Holdings, LLC, and Jared Chassen.

What happened

Great American Insurance Company v. Simpson began in New York state court and was brought to federal court by Jeffrey Simpson, who was representing himself. Great American asked the federal court to send the case back to state court, and Arch Real Estate Holdings, LLC joined that request.

The court said that all properly joined and served defendants must independently agree to removal. The other defendants had not provided notice of consent, and Arch Real Estate Holdings opposed removal.

Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the case remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. She also directed the clerk to terminate the pending motions, mail the order to Simpson, and close the federal case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Great American Insurance Company v. Simpson · No. 1:25-cv-02375
Judge
Vyskocil
Date
July 1, 2025

Background

Jeffrey Simpson, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a notice seeking to remove an interpleader action from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Great American Insurance Company, the interpleader plaintiff, moved to remand the case to state court. Arch Real Estate Holdings, LLC joined that motion and opposed removal. The remaining defendants were Offit Kurman and Jared Chassen.

Reasoning

The court explained that federal law requires all defendants who have been properly joined and served to join in or consent to removal, and that each defendant must independently express consent. The court found that none of the other defendants had provided notice of consent to removal. Because Arch Real Estate Holdings opposed removal, the statutory requirements were not satisfied. The court stated that it had no discretion in those circumstances and no authority to address Simpson’s requests for relief.

Ruling

The court ordered that the case be remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The clerk was directed to mail Simpson a copy of the order, terminate all pending motions, and remand and close the federal case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.