Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 2, 2025

Williams v. New York State

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:25-cv-02499
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Williams v. New York State, Judge Seibel dismissed claims against two state agencies and Governor Hochul but ordered service on six other defendants.

Who this affects

Alexander Williams, Jr.; the claims against DOCCS, OMH, and Governor Kathy Hochul were dismissed, while service was ordered on Kara, Kabore, Carrington, Martuscello, Sullivan, and the New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association Inc.

What happened

Alexander Williams, Jr., who is incarcerated, filed Williams v. New York State without a lawyer. He brought claims under federal civil-rights laws and the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the court had allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.

The court dismissed Williams’s claims against the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and the New York State Office of Mental Health because they duplicated his claims against New York State. It also dismissed the claims against Governor Kathy Hochul because the complaint did not allege facts showing her personal involvement. The court found that Williams had provided enough facts to continue against six other defendants.

Judge Cathy Seibel ordered the Clerk of Court to issue summonses and provide the necessary papers to the U.S. Marshals Service so it could serve Kara, Kabore, Carrington, Martuscello, Sullivan, and the New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association. The order did not decide whether Williams will ultimately win his remaining claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Williams v. New York State · No. 7:25-cv-02499
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
July 2, 2025

Background

Alexander Williams, Jr. filed this action without a lawyer while incarcerated at Eastern Correctional Facility. He asserted claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The court had granted him permission to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without paying filing fees in advance.

Williams filed an amended complaint and then a Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint added defendants, including the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (DOCCS), the New York State Office of Mental Health (OMH), Governor Kathy Hochul, National Guardsman Kara, National Guardsman Kabore, Sgt. Lyle Carrington, Daniel F. Martuscello, Ann Marie T. Sullivan, and the New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association Inc.

Claims Dismissed

The court dismissed the claims against DOCCS because it is an agency and arm of New York State, making the claims duplicative of the claims against New York State itself. The court dismissed the claims against OMH for the same reason.

The court also dismissed the claims against Governor Kathy Hochul. It explained that a claim for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 requires facts showing the defendant’s personal involvement in the alleged constitutional violation. The Second Amended Complaint did not include facts showing Governor Hochul’s personal involvement.

Claims Allowed to Proceed to Service

The court concluded that Williams had pleaded enough facts to order service on the remaining additional defendants. Those defendants were Kara, Kabore, Carrington, Martuscello, Sullivan, and the New York State Correctional Officers and Police Benevolent Association Inc.

Because Williams was proceeding without prepaying fees, the court directed the Clerk of Court to prepare the required service forms and summonses and deliver the necessary paperwork to the U.S. Marshals Service. The court extended the service period until 90 days after the summons is issued. It stated that Williams should request more time if service is not completed within that period.

Disposition

The court dismissed the claims against DOCCS, OMH, and Governor Hochul. It ordered the Clerk of Court to issue summonses and arrange for Marshals Service on the six remaining defendants. The order did not resolve the merits of Williams’s remaining claims. Judge Cathy Seibel also directed Williams to notify the court in writing if his address changes and warned that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.