Alvarado Balderramo v. Go New York Tours Inc.
- Edgardo Ramos
- 1:15-cv-02326
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Alvarado Balderramo v. Go New York Tours Inc., Judge Ramos ordered the parties to file a status letter by July 18, 2025 after the case had no recent activity.
The parties to the putative class action, including Victor H. Alvarado Balderramo, the proposed class, Go New York Tours Inc., and Asen Kostadinov, were required to provide the court with a case-status update.
What happened
Alvarado Balderramo v. Go New York Tours Inc. is a putative class action brought by Victor H. Alvarado Balderramo under federal and New York wage laws against Go New York Tours Inc. and Asen Kostadinov.
The parties told the court they were negotiating a class-action settlement and expected to seek preliminary and final approval. They last reported in April 2025 that they were finalizing the settlement and preparing motion papers, but the court stated that there had been no activity since then.
Judge Edgardo Ramos ordered the parties to submit a status letter by July 18, 2025. The order did not decide whether the settlement should be approved or resolve the wage claims.
The detailed version
- Alvarado Balderramo v. Go New York Tours Inc. · No. 1:15-cv-02326
- Edgardo Ramos
- July 9, 2025
Background
Victor H. Alvarado Balderramo brought a putative class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, New York Labor Law, the Minimum Wage Act, and the Wage Theft Protection Act against Go New York Tours Inc. and Asen Kostadinov. The opinion states that Kostadinov was the company's president and owner. In a prior opinion in this action, the court granted in part and denied in part the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment.
Settlement Discussions
The parties reported beginning private mediation in April 2023. In December 2023, they said they were preparing a settlement agreement and expected to seek preliminary approval of a class-action settlement. In July 2024, they stated that they were finalizing the settlement and preparing to request approval under Rule 23(e), which governs court approval of class-action settlements. They also said they would seek approval under the review process referenced in the opinion as “Cheeks” review. In April 2025, the parties again reported that they were finalizing the settlement and that Balderramo expected to share proposed motion papers with the defendants within the next few weeks.
Ruling
Because there had been no further activity, Judge Edgardo Ramos directed the parties to submit a status letter by July 18, 2025. The order did not grant or deny settlement approval, rule on any pending motion, or decide the underlying wage claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.