Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 9, 2025

Miller v. Jet Blue Airlines

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:25-cv-02540
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Miller v. Jet Blue Airlines, Judge Liman ruled the removed case may proceed only federally, not in New York Civil Court.

Who this affects

Victoria Miller, Jet Blue Airlines, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, and the New York City Civil Court.

What happened

Victoria Miller sued Jet Blue Airlines in New York City Civil Court. Jet Blue removed the case to federal court, saying the claim arose under the Montreal Convention, an international air-carriage treaty.

The federal court said filing the removal notice immediately ended the Civil Court’s authority to continue handling the case. The Civil Court had continued proceedings despite the removal.

Judge Lewis J. Liman ordered that the case proceed only in federal court and directed the parties to submit a joint case-management plan. The order did not decide the underlying claim.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Miller v. Jet Blue Airlines · No. 1:25-cv-02540
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
July 9, 2025

Background

Victoria Miller originally filed the lawsuit in the Civil Court of the City of New York on December 16, 2024. Jet Blue Airlines received the summons and complaint on March 15, 2025, and filed a notice removing the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on March 27, 2025. Jet Blue stated that federal jurisdiction existed because Miller’s claim arose under the Montreal Convention, an international treaty governing certain air-carriage claims.

Jet Blue served the removal papers on Miller on or about May 21, 2025, and mailed them to the New York City Civil Court clerk. Despite the removal, the Civil Court continued proceedings. The federal court scheduled a telephone conference about the removal for July 9, 2025. Jet Blue’s counsel appeared, but Miller did not, so the conference did not proceed.

Ruling

The court held that filing the notice of removal immediately transferred authority over the case to federal court and removed the Civil Court’s authority to continue handling it. Until the federal court remands the case, the state court must take no further action. The court therefore stated that the case could proceed only before the federal court and could not proceed before the Civil Court.

The court directed the parties to file a joint proposed case-management plan by July 16, 2025. They also had to provide their availability for an initial pretrial conference and state whether they preferred that conference to be by telephone or in person. The clerk was directed to mail Miller a copy of the order, and Jet Blue was directed to provide a copy to the Civil Court. The order addressed the effect of removal and case management; it did not resolve the underlying claim or state whether Jet Blue ultimately would prevail.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.