The Fashion Exchange LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC
- Sidney Stein
- 1:14-cv-01254
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 6
In The Fashion Exchange LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC, Judge Stein awarded defendants $1,099,146.45 in fees but denied their costs request.
The Fashion Exchange LLC must pay the defendants and their counsel $1,099,146.45 in attorney’s fees. The defendants were not awarded the separately requested costs.
What happened
In The Fashion Exchange LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC, the defendants asked the court to set the amount of attorney’s fees after winning summary judgment in this long-running lawsuit. The plaintiff, The Fashion Exchange LLC, did not respond to the fee application.
The court approved most of the requested attorney rates and hours but reduced the rates for paralegals, law students, and temporary attorneys. It calculated a fee award of $1,099,146.45 after deducting fees related to earlier sanctions proceedings.
Judge Sidney H. Stein granted the defendants’ application for attorney’s fees in that amount. He denied the defendants’ separate request for $44,355.97 in costs because they did not provide receipts or follow the district’s required procedure for documenting costs.
The detailed version
- The Fashion Exchange LLC v. Hybrid Promotions, LLC · No. 1:14-cv-01254
- Sidney Stein
- July 10, 2025
Background
The court had previously granted summary judgment for the defendants and dismissed The Fashion Exchange LLC’s remaining claims. It later ruled that the defendants were entitled to attorney’s fees under the Lanham Act because they prevailed and the case was exceptional due to the unreasonable way it had been litigated. The court then directed the defendants to submit records supporting the amount of fees requested.
The defendants sought $1,159,166.12 in attorney’s fees and costs from The Fashion Exchange LLC. The plaintiff did not oppose or otherwise respond to the application. The defendants’ law firm, Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, submitted more than 200 pages of billing records covering more than 2,500 hours of work. The court noted that the litigation had involved extensive motion practice, repeated requests for reconsideration, discovery disputes, and conduct that had resulted in two sanctions orders by Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang.
Attorney’s Fees
The court used the lodestar method, which multiplies reasonable hourly rates by the reasonable number of hours worked. It found that most of the requested attorney rates were reasonable for intellectual-property lawyers in the Southern District of New York. It reduced the rates for nine paralegals to $150 per hour because the application provided little justification for their requested rates of $225 to $335 per hour. It also reduced the rates for 33.4 hours billed by law students and temporary attorneys to $150 per hour, treating those rates as comparable to reasonable paralegal rates.
The court found the remaining hours reasonable in light of the plaintiff’s litigation conduct and the supporting time records. The lodestar calculation produced a presumptively reasonable fee of $1,221,002.30. The court deducted $121,855.85 for fees related to earlier sanctions proceedings, which the defendants had not sought in this application. That left an attorney’s-fee award of $1,099,146.45.
Costs and Disposition
The defendants separately requested $44,355.97 for costs, including depositions, service of process, legal research, and reproducing documents. The court denied that request because the defendants provided no receipts and did not comply with Local Rule 54.1’s requirements for filing a notice and bill of costs with supporting receipts.
Judge Sidney H. Stein granted the defendants’ application for attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,099,146.45 from The Fashion Exchange LLC. The court denied the defendants’ application for costs and directed them to serve the order on the plaintiff within seven days.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.