Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 10, 2025

Faller v. Breezy Point Energy Corp.

Judge
Clarke
Docket
7:25-cv-01604
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Faller v. Breezy Point Energy Corp., Judge Clarke granted counsel’s withdrawal, stayed mediation, and required Defendants to obtain new counsel.

Who this affects

Davidoff Law Firm, PLLC, Breezy Point Energy Corp., and Ari Goldstein; mediation in the case was stayed, and the defendants were required to obtain new counsel.

What happened

In Faller v. Breezy Point Energy Corp., the defendants’ law firm asked to withdraw because its relationship with the defendants had deteriorated and a conflict prevented continued representation. The firm also asked the court to pause a court-ordered mediation while the defendants found new counsel.

The court granted the request to pause mediation and granted the unopposed motion to withdraw. The firm must serve the order on the defendants and file proof of service by July 14, 2025.

Judge Clarke gave the defendants 60 days from that service deadline to obtain new counsel. Breezy Point Energy Corp. must be represented by a lawyer and may face default judgment if new counsel does not appear; by September 14, 2025, new counsel must file a notice of appearance and a joint status update.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Faller v. Breezy Point Energy Corp. · No. 7:25-cv-01604
Judge
Clarke
Date
July 10, 2025

Background

Davidoff Law Firm, PLLC represented Defendants Breezy Point Energy Corp. and Ari Goldstein. The firm reported that the relationship with the defendants had significantly deteriorated and that a conflict prevented it from continuing to represent them, including at court-ordered mediation. The firm had previously moved to withdraw because the defendants could not pay their legal fees. The defendants had not obtained replacement counsel.

Requests and Ruling

The firm asked the court to stay mediation and grant its motion to withdraw. The court granted the application and stayed mediation. It also granted the unopposed motion to withdraw at ECF No. 23 under Local Civil Rule 1.4, subject to the firm serving a copy of the order on the defendants and filing proof of service by July 14, 2025. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate ECF Nos. 23 and 24.

Counsel Requirement and Deadlines

The order states that Breezy Point Energy Corp., as a corporation, may not appear without a lawyer. If new counsel does not appear for the corporate defendant, the court may enter default judgment against it. The defendants have 60 days from the deadline for proof of service to obtain new counsel. By September 14, 2025, new counsel must file a notice of appearance and a joint status update.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.