Honeedew Investing LLC v. Abadi

Background

The matter was referred to the magistrate judge to conduct an inquest—an evidentiary process for determining damages—and to report and recommend findings about the plaintiff’s damages. The order cites decisions stating that a damages hearing is not necessarily required if the court has a sufficient basis for the damages amount.

Required submissions

Honeedew Investing LLC must submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning damages by August 11, 2025. The plaintiff must support factual assertions with affidavits or other evidence. Any requested attorneys’ fees and costs must be itemized using the forms included in the order, with supporting evidence.

The plaintiff must also serve the order on Jose Abadi and file proof of service by August 11, 2025.

Defendant’s response and possible hearing

Jose Abadi may submit a response by September 1, 2025. He may also request an in-court hearing by contacting the judge’s chambers by that date. If he does not respond or request a hearing, the judge stated that she intends to issue a report and recommendation about damages based solely on the plaintiff’s written submissions and without an in-court hearing.

Disposition

The order sets deadlines and procedures for the damages inquest. It does not decide the amount of damages, attorneys’ fees, or costs. It also does not state that any damages award has been entered.

Judge

The opinion identifies the magistrate judge in its text as Valerie Figueredo, while the signature appears to read “VALERIE FIGUBREDO.” This summary follows the signed name and flags the discrepancy for review.