Melrose North LLC v. Falls Lake National Insurance Company
- Rochon
- 1:25-cv-05742
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
Melrose North LLC v. Falls Lake National Insurance Company: Judge Rochon ordered jurisdictional amendments before possible dismissal.
The plaintiffs—Melrose North LLC, Melrose Housing Development Fund Corporation, Home Builders 1 L.P., Ace Industries NY LLC, and Federated Mutual Insurance Company—must provide additional citizenship allegations; Falls Lake National Insurance Company is affected by the possible jurisdictional dismissal.
What happened
In Melrose North LLC v. Falls Lake National Insurance Company, the plaintiffs brought an insurance-related case based on diversity of citizenship, which requires the parties to be citizens of different states.
The court found that the complaint did not identify the citizenship of every member of the plaintiff limited liability companies or every general and limited partner of the plaintiff limited partnership. Those details are required to determine whether the court has authority to hear the case.
Judge Rochon ordered the plaintiffs to amend their complaint by July 22, 2025, to provide the missing citizenship information. The order states that the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction if the plaintiffs cannot truthfully allege complete diversity.
The detailed version
- Melrose North LLC v. Falls Lake National Insurance Company · No. 1:25-cv-05742
- Rochon
- July 15, 2025
Background
The plaintiffs—Melrose North LLC, Melrose Housing Development Fund Corporation, Home Builders 1 L.P., Ace Industries NY LLC, and Federated Mutual Insurance Company—brought the action against Falls Lake National Insurance Company. They invoked diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, which generally requires complete diversity: no plaintiff may share citizenship with the defendant, and the amount-in-controversy requirement must also be met.
The complaint alleged citizenship information for some entities, including the corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnership, and defendant. But the court explained that an LLC is a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A limited partnership is a citizen of every state where its general and limited partners are citizens. The complaint did not affirmatively allege the citizenship of each member of the plaintiff LLCs or the citizenship of each general and limited partner of the LP Plaintiff.
Court’s Analysis
The court held that these missing allegations meant the complaint did not properly establish diversity jurisdiction. The order addressed the adequacy of the jurisdictional allegations; it did not decide the parties’ underlying dispute.
Order
The court ordered the plaintiffs to amend their complaint on or before July 22, 2025, to allege the citizenship of each person or entity comprising the plaintiff LLCs and the citizenship of each general and limited partner of the LP Plaintiff. The court stated that, if the plaintiffs could not truthfully amend the complaint to allege complete diversity, the complaint would be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice to either party. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon issued the order.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.