Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 16, 2025

Hamilton v. Greene

Judge
Clarke
Docket
7:25-cv-05647
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Hamilton v. Greene, Judge Clarke ordered service by U.S. Marshals after Hamilton was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Leshawn X. Hamilton and C.O. B. Greene, Shield #372; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service were directed to take service-related actions.

What happened

In Hamilton v. Greene, Leshawn X. Hamilton, who is detained at Orange County Jail and representing himself, alleges that C.O. B. Greene confiscated his Bible and legal materials in violation of his rights.

The court had already allowed Hamilton to proceed without prepaying filing fees. Because of that permission, the court directed the Clerk to issue a summons and send the necessary papers to the U.S. Marshals Service so Greene could be served.

Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke ordered the Clerk to complete the service paperwork and provide Greene’s address to the Marshals Service. The order also said Hamilton must request more time if service is not completed within 90 days after the summons is issued and must notify the court of any address change.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Hamilton v. Greene · No. 7:25-cv-05647
Judge
Clarke
Date
July 16, 2025

Background

Leshawn X. Hamilton, who is detained at Orange County Jail and is proceeding without a lawyer, filed this action against C.O. B. Greene, Shield #372. Hamilton alleges that Greene confiscated his Bible and legal materials in violation of his rights.

In an earlier order dated July 14, 2025, the court granted Hamilton permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. This permission is called proceeding in forma pauperis, or IFP. The order explains that a prisoner who receives IFP status still must pay the full filing fee through the required statutory process.

Service of the Complaint

Because Hamilton received IFP status, the court stated that he is entitled to assistance from the court and the U.S. Marshals Service in serving Greene. Service is the formal delivery of the lawsuit papers to the defendant. The court also explained that Hamilton could not have completed service before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summons to be issued.

Order

The court directed the Clerk of Court to mail Hamilton an information package, issue a summons for Greene, complete the U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with Greene’s address, and provide the Marshals Service with the documents needed to serve Greene. The order extends the service period to 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, Hamilton must request an extension of time.

The order further requires Hamilton to notify the court in writing if his address changes and states that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so. Judge Jessica G. L. Clarke’s order addresses service and related case administration; it does not decide whether Hamilton’s allegations are legally valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.