Amigon v. Luzon
- Philip Halpern
- 7:21-cv-02029
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Amigon v. Luzon, Judge Halpern granted summary judgment to defendants and dismissed all identified claims with prejudice.
Anthony Amigon’s first and fifth federal claims and remaining state-law claims were dismissed with prejudice; the defendants obtained summary judgment, and the case was closed.
What happened
In Amigon v. Luzon, the court entered judgment for Dylan J. Luzon and the other defendants. The judgment refers to an Opinion and Order dated July 16, 2025, but the text provided does not describe the underlying facts or legal arguments.
The court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. It dismissed Anthony Amigon’s first and fifth federal claims with prejudice and dismissed his remaining state-law claims with prejudice.
Judge Philip Halpern’s court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free appeal status. The case was closed.
The detailed version
- Amigon v. Luzon · No. 7:21-cv-02029
- Philip Halpern
- July 17, 2025
Background
The provided judgment does not state the facts underlying Anthony Amigon’s claims or identify the legal theories involved. It states that the court’s reasons appeared in an Opinion and Order dated July 16, 2025.
Ruling
The court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is a decision entered when the court determines that the applicable legal standard permits judgment without a trial. The judgment states that Amigon’s first and fifth claims for relief, which were brought under federal law, were dismissed with prejudice. It also states that Amigon’s remaining state-law claims were dismissed with prejudice.
Appeal status and case closure
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied fee-free appeal status and stated that the case was closed. Judge Philip Halpern is identified in the supplied case information; the judgment itself is signed by the court clerk.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.