Madariaga v. Mama Cat LLC
- Gregory Woods
- 1:24-cv-07715
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Madariaga v. Mama Cat LLC, Judge Gregory Woods ordered the parties to submit materials addressing whether their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement is fair and reasonable.
The plaintiffs and defendants in Madariaga v. Mama Cat LLC, including their attorneys, must jointly submit the required settlement materials.
What happened
Madariaga v. Mama Cat LLC involves one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing wages and working hours. The court’s order addresses the parties’ settlement and does not decide the underlying claims or defenses.
The parties must jointly file a letter-motion by August 12, 2025, explaining whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. They must discuss the claims and defenses, potential damages, the strengths and weaknesses of the case, the negotiation process, and other relevant issues, including whether the defendants could pay a judgment. They must also explain the attorney-fee arrangement, provide billing and cost information, attach any retainer agreement, and include the settlement agreement.
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave issued the order directing the submission to Judge Gregory H. Woods. The order requires settlement materials; it does not approve or reject the settlement.
The detailed version
- Madariaga v. Mama Cat LLC · No. 1:24-cv-07715
- Gregory Woods
- July 18, 2025
Background
The case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The order refers to a settlement and requires the parties to provide information so the court can evaluate whether that settlement is fair and reasonable. The opinion does not state the settlement amount or resolve the parties’ claims and defenses.
Required Settlement Materials
The parties must jointly file a letter-motion directed to Judge Gregory H. Woods by August 12, 2025. The filing must address:
- the claims and defenses; - the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; - the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs’ claims and the defendants’ defenses; - any reasons for a difference between the potential value of the claims and the settlement amount; - the litigation and negotiation process; and - other issues relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including the collectability of a judgment if the case proceeded to trial.
The letter-motion must also explain the attorney-fee arrangement, attach any retainer agreement, provide information about actual attorney fees and expenses—including billing records and documentation of costs—and include the settlement agreement.
Ruling
The court ordered the parties to submit the required settlement materials. The order did not approve or reject the settlement and did not decide the merits of the underlying claims. The order is signed by Sarah L. Cave, United States Magistrate Judge, and directs the joint filing to the attention of Gregory H. Woods.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.