Chuqui v. Empire Wings Express Inc.
- Sarah Cave
- 1:25-cv-01324
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Chuqui v. Empire Wings Express, Judge Cave required additional information before reviewing the parties’ wage-settlement agreement.
Luis Chuqui, his counsel, and the defendants in the proposed Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.
What happened
In Chuqui v. Empire Wings Express Inc., Luis Chuqui and the defendants asked the court to review their proposed settlement of a wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal wage law.
The court noted that the agreement was in English, while the filings and time records suggested that Spanish was Chuqui’s primary language. The agreement did not say that it had been translated for him, and Chuqui had not provided his retainer agreement or engagement letter with his lawyer.
Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered Chuqui’s lawyer to provide confirmation that the agreement had been translated into Spanish before it was signed and to provide the missing attorney-client fee documents by July 25, 2025. The order did not approve or reject the settlement.
The detailed version
- Chuqui v. Empire Wings Express Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-01324
- Sarah Cave
- July 21, 2025
Background
This is a wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The parties consented to Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave’s authority to review their proposed settlement. Luis Chuqui submitted a request for settlement approval, the proposed settlement agreement, a damages chart, his time records, and his invoices.
Under the review required by the Second Circuit’s decision in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., the court examined whether it had the information needed to evaluate the proposed FLSA settlement.
Court’s Analysis
The court stated that Chuqui’s request and time records appeared to show that Spanish was his primary language. The settlement agreement, however, was written in English and did not represent that it had been translated into Spanish for Chuqui before he signed it. The court also stated that Chuqui had not provided copies of his retainer agreement or engagement letter with his lawyer.
Order
The court ordered Chuqui’s lawyer to provide, by Friday, July 25, 2025: (1) confirmation that the settlement agreement was translated into Spanish for Chuqui’s benefit before execution; and (2) copies of Chuqui’s retainer agreement or engagement letter with his counsel. The opinion does not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement. This was a procedural order concerning the court’s review of the proposed settlement, not a decision on the underlying wage claims.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.