Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 21, 2025

Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation v. Centerlight Health System Inc.

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:25-cv-05100
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation v. Centerlight Health System Inc., Judge Liman remanded the state-law case to state court after federal claims were dropped.

Who this affects

Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation and Centerlight Health System Inc. and the other defendants; the case was returned to New York State Supreme Court, New York County, after the federal claims were dropped.

What happened

Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation initially sued Centerlight Health System Inc. and other defendants in New York state court, asserting federal racketeering claims and several state-law claims. The defendants moved the case to federal court because it included a federal claim.

After removal, Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation filed an amended complaint dropping all racketeering claims and keeping only state-law claims. It asked the federal court to send the case back to New York state court, and the defendants agreed to that request.

The court directed the Clerk of Court to remand the case to New York State Supreme Court, New York County. Judge Lewis J. Liman did not decide the underlying state-law claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation v. Centerlight Health System Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-05100
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
July 21, 2025

Background

Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation began the case by filing a complaint in New York State Supreme Court, New York County. The complaint asserted claims under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, commonly called RICO, as well as state-law claims for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, aiding and abetting fraud, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting conversion, unjust enrichment, and money had and received. It also sought injunctive and declaratory relief and an accounting.

The defendants removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York based on federal-question jurisdiction, meaning the case included a claim arising under federal law. On July 1, 2025, after removal, Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation filed an amended verified complaint that dropped all RICO claims and asserted only state-law claims.

Remand Request

Beth Abraham-CNR Foundation asked the federal court to remand, or return, the case to New York state court under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The request was made with the defendants' consent.

The court explained that when state-law claims reached federal court through removal from state court, the federal court may dismiss the claims without prejudice or remand them to state court. It also noted that courts regularly remand cases when the plaintiff voluntarily removes all federal claims after removal.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk of Court to remand the case to the New York State Supreme Court, New York County. The opinion did not decide the merits of any of the remaining state-law claims. The order was issued by Judge Lewis J. Liman.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.