Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 21, 2025

Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC v. Mohsni

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:25-cv-05870
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
ArbitrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Prodigy Finance v. Mohsni, Judge Woods ordered briefing and service for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC must file and serve the required materials and proof of service; Mariem Mohsni may oppose the petition by the stated deadline.

What happened

Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against Mariem Mohsni. The order did not decide whether the award should be confirmed.

The court ordered Prodigy Finance to file and serve its legal memorandum, a statement required by Local Civil Rule 56.1, and supporting materials by August 4, 2025. Mohsni’s opposition is due September 19, and Prodigy Finance’s reply, if any, is due October 3.

Judge Woods also ordered Prodigy Finance to serve the petition and supporting materials on Mohsni by August 11 and file proof of service by August 15. The order sets the next steps for the case rather than resolving the petition.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC v. Mohsni · No. 1:25-cv-05870
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
July 21, 2025

Background

On July 17, 2025, Prodigy Finance CM2021-1 DAC filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award against Mariem Mohsni. The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, meaning the court generally considers the parties’ written submissions and supporting evidence to decide whether confirmation is warranted.

Order

The court ordered Prodigy Finance to file a legal memorandum, a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1, and any additional supporting materials by August 4, 2025. Those materials may include affidavits or declarations stating that the petition’s exhibits are true and correct copies of what they claim to be.

Prodigy Finance must serve the petition and supporting materials on Mohsni by August 11, 2025, and file an affidavit confirming service by August 15, 2025. Mohsni’s opposition is due September 19, 2025. Prodigy Finance’s reply, if any, is due October 3, 2025.

Disposition

Judge Gregory H. Woods issued a scheduling and service order. The order did not rule on whether the arbitration award should be confirmed, and it did not grant or deny the petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.