Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 22, 2025

Rodriguez-Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-09766
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rodriguez-Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Swain dismissed the action and certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

Enki Rodriguez-Morales, whose action was dismissed, and the Commissioner of Social Security, the named defendant.

What happened

Rodriguez-Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security involved an action brought by Enki Rodriguez-Morales against the Commissioner of Social Security. The judgment does not explain the action’s underlying claims.

The court dismissed the action for the reasons stated in a separate July 22, 2025 order, which is not included here. The court also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on July 22, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez-Morales v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:24-cv-09766
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 22, 2025

Disposition

The court dismissed the action, relying on the reasons stated in a separate order dated July 22, 2025. The provided judgment does not state those reasons, identify the claims, or explain whether the dismissal was based on the merits or on a threshold issue. It therefore does not support a more specific description of why the case was dismissed.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962).

Parties Affected

The judgment dismissed Enki Rodriguez-Morales’s action against the Commissioner of Social Security. The provided text does not state any further effect on either party.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.