Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 23, 2025

Mert v. Mykonian House LLC

Judge
Katherine Failla
Docket
1:25-cv-03300
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Mert v. Mykonian House LLC, Judge Failla ordered settlement papers and a fairness letter filed by August 25, 2025, and terminated pending motions and deadlines.

Who this affects

Savas Mert; Mykonian House LLC, doing business as Mykonian House; Gregory Politis; and Alina Borys-Szewczyk.

What happened

In Mert v. Mykonian House LLC, the court was informed on July 22, 2025, that the parties had reached a settlement.

The parties were instructed to file their completed settlement agreement and a joint letter about the settlement’s fairness by August 25, 2025. The court said it would review those materials under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Second Circuit law.

Judge Katherine Polk Failla directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all pending motions and adjourn all remaining dates. The order did not state that the court had approved the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mert v. Mykonian House LLC · No. 1:25-cv-03300
Judge
Katherine Failla
Date
July 23, 2025

Background

The court was informed on July 22, 2025, that the parties had reached a settlement. The opinion identifies the parties as Savas Mert, plaintiff, and Mykonian House LLC, doing business as Mykonian House, Gregory Politis, and Alina Borys-Szewczyk, defendants.

Court’s Order

The court instructed the parties to file their completed settlement agreement and a joint letter addressing the fairness of the settlement by August 25, 2025. The court stated that it would review the proposed settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Second Circuit law, citing Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House.

The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all pending motions and adjourn all remaining dates. The order did not approve or reject the settlement, and it did not state that the case was dismissed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.