In Re: Nestor
- Rearden
- 1:24-cv-09250
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Re: Nestor: Judge Rearden dismissed Marianne Nestor’s bankruptcy appeal with prejudice after she missed a filing deadline and ignored an order to explain.
Marianne Nestor’s bankruptcy appeal was dismissed with prejudice; Neil Berger was the appellee.
What happened
In Re: Nestor concerns Marianne Nestor’s appeal from a bankruptcy-court order holding her in contempt and imposing civil sanctions. The appeal involved her sister Peggy Nestor’s bankruptcy case and a jointly owned property.
Marianne Nestor filed the required appeal materials six days late. A magistrate judge gave her a chance to explain the delay, but she did not respond or request more time. She also did not object to the recommendation that the appeal be dismissed.
Judge Jennifer H. Rearden found no clear error in the recommendation and dismissed the action with prejudice. The court directed the clerk to close the case and mail the order to Marianne Nestor.
The detailed version
- In Re: Nestor · No. 1:24-cv-09250
- Rearden
- July 24, 2025
Background
Peggy Nestor filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in the Southern District of New York. Marianne Nestor, Peggy Nestor’s sister, became involved in those proceedings through her co-ownership of a property with Peggy. Marianne appealed an October 25, 2024 Bankruptcy Court decision by Judge Michael E. Wiles that held her in contempt and imposed civil sanctions.
Missed appeal requirement
Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8009(a) required Marianne to file and serve a designation of the record items and a statement of the issues within 14 days after filing her notice of appeal. She filed those materials six days after the deadline. Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave issued an order requiring Marianne to show why the appeal should not be dismissed and gave her an opportunity to explain whether the delay resulted from excusable neglect. Marianne did not respond and did not request an extension.
Judge Cave later issued a Report and Recommendation recommending dismissal for failure to comply with the bankruptcy rules and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The recommendation gave the parties 14 days to file objections and warned that failing to object would waive further review. No objections or extension requests were filed.
District court’s review and ruling
Because no timely objections were filed, Judge Rearden reviewed the recommendation for clear error rather than conducting a fresh review of disputed issues. Clear error means an obvious mistake in the record that leaves the reviewing court firmly convinced that a mistake was made. Judge Rearden stated that the recommendation was well reasoned and supported by the facts and law, and found no clear error.
The court adopted the Report and Recommendation and dismissed the action with prejudice. It directed the clerk to close the case and mail a copy of the order to Marianne Nestor.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.