In Re: Nestor
- Rearden
- 1:24-cv-05891
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 5
In re Nestor: Judge Rearden dismissed Marianne Nestor’s bankruptcy appeal without prejudice because she filed it late and the court lacked jurisdiction.
Marianne Nestor’s appeal from the bankruptcy court was dismissed without prejudice; Albert Togut’s request for dismissal with prejudice was rejected.
What happened
In Re: Nestor involved Marianne Nestor’s appeal from a bankruptcy-court order concerning her sister Peggy Nestor’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. Marianne Nestor represented herself.
A magistrate judge recommended dismissing the appeal because Marianne Nestor did not file her notice of appeal within the required 14 days. Albert Togut objected only to dismissing the appeal without prejudice, arguing that it should be dismissed with prejudice instead.
Judge Jennifer H. Rearden overruled the objection, adopted the recommendation in its entirety, and dismissed the appeal without prejudice because the court lacked jurisdiction. The clerk was directed to close the case and mail the order to Marianne Nestor.
The detailed version
- In Re: Nestor · No. 1:24-cv-05891
- Rearden
- July 25, 2025
Background
Peggy Nestor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on April 25, 2023. Marianne Nestor, Peggy Nestor’s sister, became involved in the bankruptcy proceedings through co-ownership of a property with her sister.
The appeal concerned a June 21, 2024 bankruptcy-court decision authorizing the Chapter 11 trustee to employ Vinay Agarwal, CPA, LLC as the trustee’s accountants. Marianne Nestor appealed that decision to the district court and represented herself.
Report and Recommendation
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave ordered Marianne Nestor to show why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8002(a) requires a bankruptcy appeal notice to be filed within 14 days after entry of the order being appealed. Judge Cave determined that Marianne Nestor had not filed her notice within that period.
Judge Cave recommended dismissing the appeal without prejudice because the court lacked jurisdiction. Albert Togut objected only to the recommended form of dismissal. He argued that the appeal should be dismissed with prejudice because Marianne Nestor and the debtor had filed other late appeals and because further appeals would burden the bankruptcy estate and creditors.
District Court’s Ruling
Judge Jennifer H. Rearden reviewed the objection de novo, meaning independently and without deference to the magistrate judge’s conclusion on the challenged issue. The court explained that when a court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, it does not have power to dismiss with prejudice. The court also relied on authority treating the time limit for bankruptcy appeals as jurisdictional.
The court overruled Albert Togut’s objection, adopted Judge Cave’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and dismissed Marianne Nestor’s appeal without prejudice. The clerk was directed to close the case and mail a copy of the order to Marianne Nestor.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.