Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 25, 2025

Rodriguez v. Lulav Properties, LLC

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:25-cv-03776
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
BankruptcyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Rodriguez v. Lulav Properties, LLC, Judge Rearden stayed the action against Lulav after its Chapter 11 filing and sought positions on staying the rest.

Who this affects

Plaintiff Guere Rodriguez, Lulav Properties LLC, and the other defendants in the action. The action is stayed as to Lulav; the order leaves open whether the entire case should also be stayed.

What happened

Rodriguez v. Lulav Properties, LLC concerns a notice that Defendant Lulav Properties LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on January 17, 2025, in the Eastern District of New York.

The court stayed the action against Lulav while its bankruptcy case continues. The court also directed the plaintiff and defendants to state whether the entire case or only the claims against Lulav should be stayed, after discussing whether they could agree to pause the whole case.

Judge Jennifer H. Rearden ordered the parties to submit those positions by August 8, 2025, and to file joint status letters beginning October 1, 2025, and every 90 days afterward.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez v. Lulav Properties, LLC · No. 1:25-cv-03776
Judge
Rearden
Date
July 25, 2025

Background

The court received notice that Defendant Lulav Properties LLC filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on January 17, 2025, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Rulings and directives

The court stayed this action as to Lulav under 11 U.S.C. § 362, the bankruptcy law's automatic-stay provision, pending the outcome of Lulav's bankruptcy petition. The order does not stay the action against the other defendants at this point.

The court explained that a bankruptcy filing automatically stays certain proceedings against the debtor, but ordinarily does not automatically stay a suit against a codefendant that is not the debtor. The court noted that the stay can sometimes apply to non-debtors when a claim against the non-debtor would have an immediate adverse economic consequence for the debtor's bankruptcy estate.

By August 8, 2025, the plaintiff and all defendants must file letters stating their positions on whether the court should stay the entire case or only the action against Lulav. Before filing those letters, the parties must meet and confer about possibly agreeing to stay the entire case, even if the automatic stay does not apply to the non-debtor defendants.

By October 1, 2025, and every 90 days afterward, the parties must file a joint letter reporting whether Lulav's bankruptcy case remains pending and whether the action against Lulav should remain stayed, be dismissed, or return to the active calendar. The order does not decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.