Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 28, 2025

Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund v. Edgecombe Crane LLC

Judge
Richard Seeborg
Docket
3:24-cv-01436
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
9
ErisaContractCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund v. Edgecombe Crane LLC, Judge Seeborg entered a $65,732.14 default judgment for unpaid benefit contributions.

Who this affects

The judgment affects the plaintiffs—employee benefit plans and their trustees—and requires Edgecombe Crane LLC to pay $65,732.14 for delinquent contributions, attorney fees, and costs.

What happened

Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund v. Edgecombe Crane LLC involved employee benefit plans and trustees seeking unpaid and late-paid contributions from Edgecombe Crane under federal benefits law and related agreements. Edgecombe did not answer the lawsuit or otherwise appear.

The court found that it had jurisdiction, that Edgecombe was properly served, and that the plans supported their claimed contributions, interest, liquidated damages, attorney fees, and costs with declarations and records. The court therefore granted the request for a default judgment.

Judge Seeborg entered judgment for the plaintiffs against Edgecombe Crane in the total amount of $65,732.14, including $47,063.06 for delinquent payments, $18,109.50 in attorney fees, and $559.58 in costs.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund v. Edgecombe Crane LLC · No. 3:24-cv-01436
Judge
Richard Seeborg
Date
July 28, 2025

Background

The plaintiffs are employee benefit plans and their trustees. They sued Edgecombe Crane LLC for unpaid and late-paid benefit contributions allegedly required by bargaining and trust agreements. Those agreements required contributions based on hours worked by or paid to Edgecombe’s employees and provided for interest, liquidated damages, attorney fees, audit fees, and other collection expenses.

The plaintiffs first sought payroll records and contributions in

  1. After Edgecombe did not respond to demand letters, the plaintiffs filed suit in March 2024 and served the complaint on May 13,
  2. Edgecombe did not file an answer or otherwise respond. The Clerk entered default on June 10,
  3. Edgecombe later provided some delinquent contribution reports and agreed to cooperate with an audit, but it did not dispute the draft audit findings, provide all requested reports and payments, appear in the case, or oppose the motion for default judgment.

Legal standard and analysis

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55, a clerk must first enter default before the court may decide whether to enter a default judgment. The court considered the factors used to evaluate such a request, including prejudice to the plaintiffs, the apparent strength of their claims, the sufficiency of the complaint, the amount at stake, the likelihood of factual disputes, whether Edgecombe’s failure to respond was excusable, and the preference for decisions on the merits.

The court found that federal jurisdiction existed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Labor Management Relations Act. It also found that Edgecombe had been properly served through its registered agent. The court concluded that ERISA required an employer bound by a collective bargaining agreement to make contributions according to that agreement. Because the agreements provided for liquidated damages and the plaintiffs showed that unpaid contributions existed when the lawsuit was filed, the court found that the plaintiffs had established their entitlement to unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, reasonable attorney fees, and costs.

The court accepted the plaintiffs’ supporting declarations, calculations, pay stubs, and other documents. It also allowed claims for contributions that became delinquent after the lawsuit was filed, explaining that requiring a new lawsuit for each later delinquency would undermine ERISA’s goals. The agreements called for liquidated damages of 20 percent after litigation began and interest at 10 percent per year on delinquent contributions.

Relief and disposition

The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. It awarded $47,063.06 for delinquent payments, $18,109.50 in reasonable attorney fees, and $559.58 in costs, for a total judgment of $65,732.14 against Edgecombe Crane, LLC. Judge Richard Seeborg also vacated the hearing set for July 31, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 9-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.