Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 28, 2025

Coach IP Holdings, LLC v. ACS Group Acquisition LLC

Judge
Lorna Schofield
Docket
1:23-cv-10612
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Coach IP Holdings v. ACS Group Acquisition, Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo granted Coach’s motion to provisionally seal specified filings and exhibits.

Who this affects

Coach IP Holdings, LLC, Coach Services, Inc., Tapestry, Inc., Case-Mate, Inc., and public access to the specified filings and exhibits.

What happened

Coach IP Holdings, LLC v. ACS Group Acquisition LLC involved Coach’s request to restrict public access to highlighted portions of its opposition brief and two exhibits. The materials contained information designated confidential by Coach and Case-Mate, Inc.

The court granted the motion to provisionally seal the identified materials. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion at ECF No. 219 and maintain viewing restrictions at ECF No. 221.

Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo also directed Case-Mate, Inc. to make the required showing for permanent sealing by August 25, 2025, if it wanted the documents to remain permanently sealed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Coach IP Holdings, LLC v. ACS Group Acquisition LLC · No. 1:23-cv-10612
Judge
Lorna Schofield
Date
July 28, 2025

Background

Coach IP Holdings, LLC, Coach Services, Inc., and Tapestry, Inc. asked the court to restrict public access to highlighted portions of Coach’s opposition to Vinci Brands LLC’s motion to amend its counterclaims and add defendants. They also asked to restrict access to Exhibits B and C attached to a supporting declaration.

The request relied on confidentiality protections established in protective orders in two related matters. Case-Mate, Inc. had designated Exhibits B and C as confidential. The letter stated that the exhibits contained confidential information belonging to Coach and Case-Mate and that the opposition brief cited that information. Case-Mate had agreed to remove its confidentiality designation from Exhibit A, allowing Coach to file that exhibit publicly.

Court’s Action

The court granted the motion to provisionally seal the identified portions of the opposition and Exhibits B and C. It directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motion at ECF No. 219 and maintain the viewing restrictions at ECF No. 221.

The court further directed Case-Mate, Inc. to make a showing under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006), by August 25, 2025, if Case-Mate wanted the documents to be permanently sealed. The opinion does not state that the court permanently sealed the documents.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.