Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 30, 2025

Fye v. Baez Hughes Development Corp.

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:25-cv-01527
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Fye v. Baez Hughes Development Corp., Judge Rochon ordered the parties to consider magistrate-judge consent or a settlement conference, without deciding the case’s merits.

Who this affects

Mohamodou Fye and Baez Hughes Development Corp., Valdesia Gardens LLC, 320 E 176th Street LLC, Leopoldo Baez, and Emanuel Kambanis.

What happened

In Fye v. Baez Hughes Development Corp., the parties told the court that mediation had failed. The court therefore asked them to consider having Magistrate Judge Stein handle all further proceedings.

If everyone agrees, the parties must file a completed consent form within two weeks. If anyone does not agree, the parties must file a joint letter within two weeks without identifying who withheld consent, and they must say whether they want a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Stein.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon did not decide the underlying claims. The order also reminded the parties that settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act usually require court approval.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fye v. Baez Hughes Development Corp. · No. 1:25-cv-01527
Judge
Rochon
Date
July 30, 2025

Background

The parties notified the court that mediation had been unsuccessful. The court issued this case-management order to promote efficiency and seek a faster resolution.

Order concerning magistrate-judge consent

The court ordered the parties to discuss whether they would voluntarily consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) to having Magistrate Judge Stein conduct all further proceedings, including any trial and entry of final judgment. If all parties consent, they must submit a fully completed consent form within two weeks of the order. If the court approves the form, Magistrate Judge Stein—not the district judge—will conduct the remaining proceedings. Any appeal would go directly to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

If any party does not consent, the parties must file a joint letter within two weeks stating that they do not consent, without identifying the party or parties who withheld consent. The order states that withholding consent will not result in adverse consequences. The parties must also state whether they want a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Stein.

Other reminder and disposition

The court reminded the parties that settlements of claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act generally must be approved by the court. Judge Jennifer L. Rochon did not rule on the merits of the claims and did not grant or deny a dispositive motion. The order addressed only possible referral to a magistrate judge and settlement procedures.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.