Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 30, 2025

Simpson v. Chassen

Judge
Jesse Furman
Docket
1:25-cv-04004
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Simpson v. Chassen, Judge Furman awarded Chassen $27,271.62 in fees and costs after reducing the requested amount.

Who this affects

Defendant Jared Chassen receives a judgment for $27,271.62 in attorney’s fees and costs; the order also immediately permits enforcement of that judgment.

What happened

In Simpson v. Chassen, the court had previously awarded Defendant Jared Chassen attorney’s fees connected to a request to send the case back to state court. The court ordered Chassen to provide billing records and invited Plaintiff Jeffrey Simpson to respond.

Simpson’s response did not address the requested fees and costs; instead, it repeated his disagreement with the court’s earlier finding that the removal was objectively unreasonable. The court had already denied reconsideration of that finding.

Judge Jesse M. Furman found Chassen’s counsel’s hourly rate reasonable but excluded $33,354 for work on an earlier removed action. He awarded $27,081 in fees and $190.62 in costs, and directed the clerk to enter judgment for Chassen totaling $27,271.62, immediately enforceable.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Simpson v. Chassen · No. 1:25-cv-04004
Judge
Jesse Furman
Date
July 30, 2025

Background

On June 27, 2025, the court granted Defendant Jared Chassen’s request for attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), ordered him to submit an accounting supported by contemporaneous billing records and other documentation, and invited Plaintiff Jeffrey Simpson to respond. Chassen then submitted his fee and cost request.

Simpson’s opposition did not address Chassen’s requested fees or costs. Instead, it repeated Simpson’s disagreement with the court’s earlier finding that his removal of the action was objectively unreasonable. The court noted that it had already denied reconsideration of that finding.

Fee Calculation

The court applied the lodestar method, which calculates a presumptively reasonable fee by multiplying a reasonable hourly rate by a reasonable number of hours. The court found that Chassen’s counsel charged a reasonable hourly rate, but concluded that the request improperly included hours billed in a prior removed action in the same district.

The court reduced the claimed attorney’s fees by $33,354, the amount attributed to work on the prior action. That reduction left $27,081 in attorney’s fees. The court also awarded $190.62 in costs.

Ruling

The court awarded Chassen attorney’s fees and costs totaling $27,271.62. It found no reason to delay enforcement of the award and directed the clerk to enter judgment in favor of Chassen for that amount.

Judge Jesse M. Furman signed the memorandum opinion and order on July 30, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.