Goodwin v. CoWorx Staffing Svcs LLC
- Garnett
- 1:25-cv-05248
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Goodwin v. CoWorx Staffing Svcs LLC, Judge Garnett ordered U.S. Marshals to serve the defendant after Gwen Goodwin received permission to proceed without paying fees.
Gwen Goodwin and CoWorx Staffing Svcs LLC; the Clerk of Court and U.S. Marshals Service are directed to carry out service.
What happened
In Goodwin v. CoWorx Staffing Svcs LLC, Gwen Goodwin, who is representing herself, alleges that the defendant violated the Family and Medical Leave Act and other federal and state laws.
The court had already allowed Goodwin to proceed without paying court fees. Because of that permission, she could rely on the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant.
Judge Garnett ordered the Clerk of Court to issue the summons, prepare the service paperwork, and send it to the Marshals Service. The order did not decide whether Goodwin’s allegations are valid.
The detailed version
- Goodwin v. CoWorx Staffing Svcs LLC · No. 1:25-cv-05248
- Garnett
- July 30, 2025
Background
Gwen Goodwin is representing herself and brings claims alleging that CoWorx Staffing Svcs LLC violated the Family and Medical Leave Act and other federal and state laws. In an earlier order dated July 25, 2025, the court allowed Goodwin to proceed without prepaying court fees.
Service of Process
Because Goodwin was permitted to proceed without prepaying fees, the court stated that she could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court extended the usual service deadline: Goodwin must have the complaint served within 90 days after the summons is issued. If service is not completed within that period, she should ask for an extension of time.
Ruling
The court ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for CoWorx Staffing Svcs LLC, complete the U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form with the defendant’s address, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service. The Clerk was also directed to mail Goodwin an information package. The court warned that Goodwin must notify the court in writing if her address changes and that the action may be dismissed if she does not do so. Judge Margaret M. Garnett did not rule on the merits of Goodwin’s claims.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.