Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 30, 2025

Off White Operating SRL v. Saks & Company LLC

Judge
P. Castel
Docket
1:25-cv-06203
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Off White Operating SRL v. Saks & Company LLC, Judge Castel ordered jurisdictional corrections before deciding whether the case may proceed.

Who this affects

The order affects Off White Operating SRL, Venice SRL, Saks & Company LLC, and Saks.com LLC. The plaintiffs must obtain and plead the required citizenship information, and the action may be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction if complete diversity is not alleged.

What happened

Off White Operating SRL and Venice SRL sued Saks & Company LLC and Saks.com LLC. The complaint relied on diversity jurisdiction but did not provide all information needed to determine whether the parties are citizens of different places.

Judge Castel gave the plaintiffs permission to ask each defendant one written question about the citizenship of its members. The defendants must answer within 14 days, and the plaintiffs must amend the complaint within 45 days to provide the missing information and identify their principal places of business rather than only their registered offices.

Judge Castel warned that the case will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction if the amended complaint does not show complete diversity of citizenship. The order did not decide the underlying dispute.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Off White Operating SRL v. Saks & Company LLC · No. 1:25-cv-06203
Judge
P. Castel
Date
July 30, 2025

Background

The plaintiffs' complaint asserted federal jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. That jurisdiction generally requires all plaintiffs to be citizens of different states or foreign countries from all defendants, and the complaint must allege the relevant citizenship facts clearly.

The complaint described Saks & Company LLC and Saks.com LLC as limited liability companies organized under Delaware law with headquarters in New York. But it did not identify the citizenship of the members of either limited liability company. For a limited liability company, the citizenship inquiry includes the citizenship of its members; if a member is a corporation, the relevant allegations include that corporation's place of incorporation and principal place of business.

The complaint identified Off White Operating SRL and Venice SRL as Italian corporations with registered offices in Milan. The Court stated that, for diversity purposes, the complaint must allege each corporation's principal place of business, meaning the place where its officers direct, control, and coordinate its activities, rather than merely its registered office.

Court's Order

Within 14 days of the order, the plaintiffs may serve one interrogatory on each defendant asking for the citizenship of all natural-person members and, for any corporate member, its jurisdiction of incorporation and principal place of business. Each defendant must respond within 14 days.

Within 45 days of the order, the plaintiffs must amend the complaint to truthfully and accurately allege the citizenship of the defendant limited liability companies and the principal places of business of the plaintiffs. If the amended complaint does not establish complete diversity, the action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without further notice. The order addressed jurisdictional pleading requirements and did not resolve the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.