Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 4, 2025

Sojka v. Mudge

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:23-cv-03741
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to DismissTortPro Se
In one sentence

In Sojka v. Mudge, Judge Torres adopted a recommendation granting Mudge’s dismissal motion without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction and denying leave to amend.

Who this affects

The order ended Julian Sojka’s case against Sterling Mudge by granting Mudge’s dismissal motion without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction and denying leave to amend.

What happened

Julian Sojka sued Sterling Mudge, who was representing himself, alleging civil battery, assault, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and intentional infliction of emotional distress in Sojka v. Mudge.

Mudge asked the court to dismiss the complaint, including for lack of personal jurisdiction. A magistrate judge recommended granting that motion without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction and denying Sojka permission to amend the complaint. Neither party objected to the recommendation.

Judge Analisa Torres found no clear error, adopted the recommendation in full, directed the clerk to terminate the motion, and closed the case. The dismissal was without prejudice, as stated in the court’s order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sojka v. Mudge · No. 1:23-cv-03741
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Aug. 4, 2025

Background

Julian Sojka brought claims against Sterling Mudge for civil battery, assault, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The opinion states that Mudge was proceeding without a lawyer. Mudge moved to dismiss the complaint on several grounds, including lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and lack of personal jurisdiction.

Report and Recommendation

The court referred Mudge’s motion to Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofksy. The report and recommendation advised granting Mudge’s motion without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction and denying leave to amend the complaint. The parties were notified of their right to object, but no objections were filed before the deadline expired.

Ruling

Because no objections were filed, Judge Torres reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error. She found none and adopted it in its entirety. The court therefore granted Mudge’s motion to dismiss without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction, denied leave to amend the complaint, directed the clerk to terminate the motion, and closed the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.