Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 4, 2025

Willis v. New York City Department of Homeless Services

Judge
Sarah Cave
Docket
1:24-cv-00735
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Willis v. City of New York, Judge Cave directed marshals to serve newly added defendants in Willis’s amended complaint.

Who this affects

Rodney Willis and the newly added defendants—Monique Murray, Patricia Britton, and Cassandra White—were affected. The order also addressed service involving the existing defendants.

What happened

In Willis v. City of New York, Rodney Willis added Monique Murray, Patricia Britton, and Cassandra White to his amended complaint. He was representing himself and had permission to proceed without paying filing fees.

Willis asked the court to have the U.S. Marshals serve the newly added defendants. Denise Turner said she would accept service and answer, while counsel for the other defendants said the new defendants first had to be served.

Judge Sarah L. Cave directed the Clerk of Court to prepare summonses and service paperwork and send them to the U.S. Marshals. The order also gave Willis 90 days after the summonses are issued to request more time if service is not completed.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Willis v. New York City Department of Homeless Services · No. 1:24-cv-00735
Judge
Sarah Cave
Date
Aug. 4, 2025

Background

Rodney Willis, who was representing himself, filed a Second Amended Complaint adding Monique Murray, Patricia Britton, and Cassandra White as defendants. He later filed a consolidated version of that complaint and asked the court to direct the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the newly added defendants.

The court had allowed Willis to proceed without paying filing fees. Denise Turner informed the court that she accepted service and intended to answer the amended complaint. Counsel for the City of New York and Kevin Perdomo stated that the newly added defendants first had to be served before it could be determined whether the city’s legal office would represent them or whether they would move to dismiss or answer.

Court’s Action

Because Willis had permission to proceed without paying filing fees, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals to serve the amended complaint. The court directed the Clerk of Court to complete the required service form, issue summonses for Murray, Britton, and White, and provide the U.S. Marshals with the documents needed to serve them at the address listed in the order.

Judge Sarah L. Cave also stated that if service is not completed within 90 days after the summonses are issued, Willis should request an extension of time. The order directed the Clerk to mail Willis a copy of the order and required him to notify the court in writing if his address changes. The opinion states that the court may dismiss the action if he fails to provide that notice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.