Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Aug. 4, 2025

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. National…

Full caption

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. National Drywall Inc.

Judge
Subramanian
Docket
1:25-cv-02348
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
ArbitrationSummary JudgmentFee Petition
In one sentence

In Drywall Tapers v. National Drywall, Judge Subramanian confirmed the entire arbitration award and awarded fees, costs, and interest.

Who this affects

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 obtained confirmation of the entire arbitration award and related fees, costs, and interest against National Drywall Inc.

What happened

Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. National Drywall Inc. concerned the union’s request to confirm an arbitration award. The union filed the request on March 21, 2025.

National Drywall Inc. did not oppose the request or seek other relief from the arbitration award by the court’s deadline. The court reviewed the union’s petition and supporting materials as it would a motion for summary judgment, meaning it examined whether the evidence showed any real dispute requiring a trial.

Judge Arun Subramanian found no genuine dispute and no legal basis to cancel the award. The court granted the union’s unopposed petition to confirm the entire award and also awarded attorneys’ fees, costs, nine-percent prejudgment interest, and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 v. National… · No. 1:25-cv-02348
Judge
Subramanian
Date
Aug. 4, 2025

Background

On March 21, 2025, Drywall Tapers and Painters of Greater New York Local Union 1974 filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against National Drywall Inc. The court set a schedule for additional supporting materials, National Drywall’s opposition, and the union’s reply. The union served National Drywall with the petition, supporting materials, and briefing schedule.

National Drywall’s opposition was due by May 8, 2025. The court stated that, as of the opinion, National Drywall had neither responded to the petition nor sought other relief from the award.

Court’s Analysis

The court treated the unopposed petition like a motion for summary judgment based on the union’s submissions. It found that there was no genuine issue of material fact preventing summary judgment as to any part of the award. The court concluded that the arbitrator’s decision provided more than a “barely colorable justification” for its outcome.

The court also found no basis under Section 10(a) of the Federal Arbitration Act to vacate, or cancel, the award. It determined that the union had proved that its requested attorneys’ fees and costs were reasonable and necessary, including the hours worked, rates charged, and litigation costs incurred.

Relief Granted

Judge Arun Subramanian granted the union’s unopposed petition to confirm the entire arbitration award. The court also granted the union’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs, prejudgment interest at nine percent, and post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a), accruing at the statutory rate from the date judgment is entered until payment.

The opinion does not state the underlying amount or terms of the arbitration award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.