Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 4, 2025

In re: Malachi Reynolds

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04527
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In re Malachi Reynolds: Judge Torres added New York City as a defendant in Reynolds’s conditions-of-confinement lawsuit.

Who this affects

Malachi Reynolds and the City of New York; the New York City Department of Correction and New York City Law Department were directed to receive notice.

What happened

In re: Malachi Reynolds concerns a lawsuit by Malachi Reynolds, who is detained at West Facility on Rikers Island and alleges that sanitation, plumbing, and mail-service conditions violate his constitutional rights. He is representing himself and was allowed to proceed without paying court fees in advance.

Because Reynolds’s complaint did not name a defendant in its caption, the court considered his allegations and his clear intent to sue New York City. The court treated the complaint as asserting claims against the City because the city Department of Correction operates West Facility.

Judge Analisa Torres ordered the Clerk of Court to add the City of New York as a defendant and notify the city Department of Correction and Law Department. The order does not prevent the City from asserting defenses, and it does not decide whether Reynolds’s claims are valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In re: Malachi Reynolds · No. 1:25-cv-04527
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 4, 2025

Background

Malachi Reynolds, proceeding without a lawyer, is detained at West Facility on Rikers Island. He filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law allowing claims against state or local actors for violating federal rights. He alleges that conditions at the facility—including sanitation, plumbing, and mail-service conditions—violate his federal constitutional rights. The court had previously allowed him to proceed without paying filing fees in advance.

Adding a Defendant

The complaint did not include a caption naming an opposing party. The Clerk of Court therefore opened the case without a formally designated defendant. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 allows a court, on a party’s motion or on its own, to add or remove a party at any time on fair terms. The court explained that this rule gives courts discretion to organize a case efficiently and fairly, including by adding as a defendant an entity mentioned in the complaint as involved in the alleged events.

The court found that Reynolds clearly intended to assert claims against the City of New York. Because the New York City Department of Correction operates West Facility, the court construed the complaint as asserting claims against the City.

Order

Judge Analisa Torres directed the Clerk of Court to add the City of New York as a defendant under Rule 21 and to notify the New York City Department of Correction and the New York City Law Department. The court requested that the City waive service of the summons. The addition of the City was expressly made without prejudice to any defenses the City may assert. The court also directed the Clerk to mail Reynolds a copy of the order and an information package. The order addresses the case’s parties and service; it does not decide the merits of Reynolds’s constitutional claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.