Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 3, 2025

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v…

Full caption

Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. New York City Acoustics, Inc.

Judge
Gregory Woods
Docket
1:25-cv-06296
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureArbitration
In one sentence

In Trustees v. New York City Acoustics, Judge Woods set briefing and service deadlines for a petition to confirm an arbitration award.

Who this affects

The petitioners, the respondent New York City Acoustics, Inc., and the court’s schedule for deciding the petition to confirm the arbitration award.

What happened

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, and Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. New York City Acoustics, Inc. concerns a petition filed on July 31, 2025, asking the court to confirm an arbitration award.

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve a legal memorandum, a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1, and supporting materials by August 22, 2025. The respondent’s opposition is due October 6, 2025, and any reply is due October 24, 2025. The petitioners must serve the petition and supporting materials by August 8 and file proof of service by August 11.

Judge Gregory H. Woods issued this scheduling order. The order set the filing and service deadlines; it did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Trustees Of The New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund v… · No. 1:25-cv-06296
Judge
Gregory Woods
Date
Aug. 3, 2025

Background

The petitioners filed a petition on July 31, 2025, seeking confirmation of an arbitration award. The opinion states that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated similarly to a motion for summary judgment, which is a request for judgment based on the submitted record when there is no genuine dispute requiring a trial.

Court’s Order

The court ordered the petitioners to file and serve a memorandum of law, a statement under Local Civil Rule 56.1, and any additional supporting materials by August 22, 2025. The court also directed the petitioners to provide affidavits or declarations establishing that the petition’s exhibits are true and correct copies of what they claim to be.

The respondent’s opposition is due by October 6, 2025. Any reply from the petitioners is due by October 24, 2025. The petitioners must serve the petition and supporting materials on the respondent by August 8, 2025, and file an affidavit confirming service by August 11, 2025.

Disposition

Judge Gregory H. Woods issued an order setting briefing and service requirements. The opinion does not state that the court granted or denied the petition to confirm the arbitration award.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.