Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 5, 2025

Omlor v. Amelio

Judge
Analisa Torres
Docket
1:24-cv-10057
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Omlor v. Amelio, Judge Netburn ordered redactions of sensitive financial and Social Security information from a removal filing.

Who this affects

The order directly affects Defendant Alfonso Amelio, who must redact or omit specified pages from his removal notice, and protects sensitive financial and Social Security information involving Jeanne Omlor and minor children.

What happened

In Omlor v. Amelio, Defendant Alfonso Amelio removed the case from New York state court and attached financial documents to his removal notice. The documents included Social Security numbers, bank account information, tax records, and other personal financial information involving Jeanne Omlor and minor children.

The court ordered Amelio, within one week, to file a redacted copy of the removal notice. The required redactions cover specified Social Security numbers and Omlor’s personal banking records. If Amelio cannot redact the information, he may refile the notice with the affected pages omitted.

Judge Sarah Netburn issued the order on August 5, 2025, based on privacy concerns involving sensitive financial information.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Omlor v. Amelio · No. 1:24-cv-10057
Judge
Analisa Torres
Date
Aug. 5, 2025

Background

Defendant Alfonso Amelio removed this case from the Supreme Court of New York, New York County. With his notice of removal, he filed Plaintiff Jeanne Omlor’s statement of net worth, wage and tax documents, federal and state income tax records, and personal banking records. The court stated that several documents contained Social Security numbers belonging to Omlor and minor children, as well as Omlor’s personal bank account numbers.

Court’s action

The court cited privacy concerns relating to sensitive financial information that could be misused, create a personal safety issue, or cause embarrassment if publicly released. It ordered Amelio to file, within one week of receiving the order, a copy of the notice of removal with these redactions:

- Jeanne Omlor’s Social Security number on pages 135 and 144–172; - Oona Carysse Amelio’s Social Security number on pages 145, 166, and 170; - Solene Ines Amelio’s Social Security number on pages 145, 166, and 170; and - Jeanne Omlor’s personal banking records on pages 173–176.

The court stated that, if Amelio could not redact the information, he could refile the notice of removal with those pages omitted. The order was issued by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.