Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 5, 2025

Crumbsie v. Blake or Burke

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
7:25-cv-03780
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro SeDiscovery
In one sentence

In Crumbsie v. Blake or Burke, Judge Karas ordered service and case procedures for Crumbsie’s sexual-assault lawsuit.

Who this affects

Spencer T. Crumbsie and Officer Blake or Burke; the clerk of court and U.S. Marshals Service also received procedural directions.

What happened

In Crumbsie v. Blake or Burke, Spencer T. Crumbsie, who is incarcerated and representing himself, alleges under a federal civil-rights law that Officer Blake or Burke sexually assaulted him. The court had previously allowed Crumbsie to proceed without paying filing fees upfront.

The court directed the clerk to issue a summons, complete the service paperwork, and send the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service so the defendant can be served. The court also extended the service deadline to 90 days after the summons is issued and explained that Crumbsie must request more time if service is not completed by then.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas also ruled that a local prisoner-case discovery rule applies. Officer Blake or Burke must respond to specified discovery requests within 120 days after being served. The order did not decide whether Crumbsie’s sexual-assault allegation is legally valid.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Crumbsie v. Blake or Burke · No. 7:25-cv-03780
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 5, 2025

Background

Spencer T. Crumbsie, who is incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility and is proceeding without a lawyer, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that Officer Blake or Burke subjected him to sexual assault. The court had previously granted Crumbsie permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Service of the lawsuit

Because Crumbsie was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court stated that he may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendant. The court instructed the clerk to complete a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form, issue a summons, and deliver the necessary documents to the Marshals Service.

The court extended the usual service period so that the deadline is 90 days after the summons is issued. If the complaint is not served within that period, Crumbsie must request an extension of time. The court also instructed Crumbsie to notify the court in writing of any address change and stated that the action may be dismissed if he fails to do so.

Discovery procedure and ruling

The court held that Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies. That rule requires defendants in certain prisoner cases to respond to specified court-ordered interrogatories and requests for documents. Officer Blake or Burke must serve responses to those standard requests within 120 days after service of the complaint and must quote each request verbatim in the responses.

The court ordered the clerk to issue the summons, prepare the service materials, and send the documents to the Marshals Service. It also ruled that Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies and directed the clerk to mail Crumbsie an information package. This order addressed service and case administration; it did not decide the merits of the sexual-assault allegation.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.