Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 7, 2025

Beauchamp v. Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:25-cv-06354
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
5
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Beauchamp v. Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, Judge Abrams ordered service of the pro se employment-discrimination complaint through the U.S. Marshals Service.

Who this affects

Yvonne P. Beauchamp, the listed defendants, the Clerk of Court, and the U.S. Marshals Service.

What happened

In Beauchamp v. Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, Yvonne P. Beauchamp, representing herself, brought claims alleging that her employer discriminated against her because of her race, color, national origin, and age. The claims invoke federal, New York State, and New York City employment-discrimination laws.

Because the court had allowed Beauchamp to proceed without prepaying filing fees, it directed the Clerk to issue summonses and prepare the paperwork needed for the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The order lists the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, the Bureau of Child Care, and eight named individuals as defendants.

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the Clerk to provide the Marshals Service with the necessary documents and to mail Beauchamp an information package. The complaint must be served within 90 days after the summonses are issued, and Beauchamp must request more time if service is not completed by then. The order does not decide whether the alleged discrimination occurred.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Beauchamp v. Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene · No. 1:25-cv-06354
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Aug. 7, 2025

Background

Yvonne P. Beauchamp filed a case without a lawyer against the Department of Health & Mental Hygiene and other defendants. She brings claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the New York State Human Rights Law, and the New York City Human Rights Law. She alleges that her employer discriminated against her because of her race, color, national origin, and age.

The court had granted Beauchamp permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. In such cases, federal law requires the court to assist with service of process, meaning the formal delivery of the complaint and summons to the defendants.

Court’s Order

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered the Clerk of Court to issue summonses and complete U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms for these defendants:

- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene - The Bureau of Child Care - Bella Morrow - Anita Richichi - Marina Smirnov - Jennifer Wayne - Melanie Argueta - Stacey Rosenblatt - Juan Arroyo - Renee Noel

The Clerk must deliver the summonses and other necessary paperwork to the U.S. Marshals Service so that the Marshals Service can serve the defendants. The order also directs the Clerk to mail Beauchamp an information package.

The court stated that service must occur within 90 days after the summonses are issued. If service is not completed by then, Beauchamp should request an extension of time. She must also notify the court in writing if her address changes; the order warns that the court may dismiss the action if she fails to do so.

Disposition and Scope

The court entered an order directing service. It did not rule on the merits of Beauchamp’s discrimination allegations, and it did not determine whether any defendant violated the cited laws.

The authoritative version

Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.