Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 12, 2025

In Re: JCK Legacy Company

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:25-cv-03727
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In re: JCK Legacy Company: Judge Ramos authorized fee-free filing but denied Alberto Colt-Sarmiento’s request for appointed counsel without prejudice.

Who this affects

Alberto Colt-Sarmiento, whose request to proceed without prepaying fees was authorized but whose request for appointed pro bono counsel was denied without prejudice.

What happened

In re: JCK Legacy Company concerns Alberto Colt-Sarmiento’s appeal of a Bankruptcy Court order involving his disallowed claim. He asked the district court to review that order and later requested fee-free filing and appointed volunteer counsel.

Because Mr. Colt-Sarmiento is incarcerated, the court authorized him to proceed without paying the filing fees in advance. The court explained that it generally cannot require a lawyer to represent someone in a civil case, but it may request a volunteer lawyer in appropriate circumstances.

The court denied Mr. Colt-Sarmiento’s request for appointed counsel without prejudice, meaning he may renew it later. Judge Edgardo Ramos said the court could not yet conclude that his claims were likely to have merit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
In Re: JCK Legacy Company · No. 1:25-cv-03727
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
Aug. 12, 2025

Background

Alberto Colt-Sarmiento, appearing without a lawyer, filed an appeal seeking review of a March 21, 2025 Bankruptcy Court order. That order denied his request to amend, reconsider, or obtain relief from an earlier Bankruptcy Court order disallowing his proof of claim. Yale Scott Bogen is identified as the appellee. On August 7, 2025, Colt-Sarmiento asked the district court to waive the appeal’s filing fee and appoint volunteer counsel.

Filing Fees

Because Colt-Sarmiento is incarcerated, the court authorized him to proceed without prepaying fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Request for Counsel

The court explained that courts generally cannot require attorneys to represent people without lawyers in civil cases. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), however, the court may ask its Pro Se Office to seek a volunteer attorney from the court’s Pro Bono Panel for an indigent litigant. The court said the first consideration is whether the litigant’s position appears likely to have substance, followed by factors such as the person’s ability to gather facts and present the case without assistance.

Ruling

The court stated that, at this stage, it could not conclude that Colt-Sarmiento’s claims were likely to have merit, while noting that this could change as the litigation progresses. It therefore DENIED without prejudice his application for appointment of pro bono counsel, allowing a possible renewal at a later stage. The order did not decide the merits of his appeal from the Bankruptcy Court order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.