Imperial Jewelers & Trading Inc. v. UPS Capital Corporation
- Jed Rakoff
- 1:25-cv-05785
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
Imperial Jewelers v. UPS Capital: the parties jointly asked Judge Rakoff to send the claims to arbitration and pause the case.
Imperial Jewelers & Trading Inc., UPS Capital Corporation, and FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.; the requested relief would concern whether the claims proceed in arbitration and whether the federal case is paused.
What happened
Imperial Jewelers & Trading Inc. v. UPS Capital Corporation concerns a shipment arranged through Parcel Pro, which the letter identifies as a UPS Capital company, and sent through FedEx. The parties told the court that the shipment’s terms included an arbitration requirement.
Imperial Jewelers, UPS Capital Corporation, and FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc. jointly requested that all of Imperial Jewelers’ claims be sent to American Arbitration Association arbitration. They also asked the court to pause the federal case while the arbitration proceeded.
The provided text is a joint request letter, not a ruling. Judge Rakoff had not stated in this text whether he granted or denied the request.
The detailed version
- Imperial Jewelers & Trading Inc. v. UPS Capital Corporation · No. 1:25-cv-05785
- Jed Rakoff
- Aug. 12, 2025
Nature of the Filing
The provided document is a joint letter application from Imperial Jewelers & Trading, Inc. (the plaintiff), UPS Capital Corporation, and FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc. (the defendants). It asks the court to refer the plaintiff’s claims to binding arbitration before the American Arbitration Association and to stay, or pause, the federal court proceedings while arbitration is completed.
Background and Parties’ Position
The letter says the action arose from Imperial Jewelers’ shipment of goods with Parcel Pro, described in the letter as a UPS Capital company, through FedEx. According to the parties, Imperial Jewelers agreed to Parcel Pro’s Terms and Conditions when arranging the shipment. The quoted terms contain an arbitration clause covering disputes arising from or related to those terms or Parcel Pro’s services. The terms also state that arbitration would be conducted by the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Arbitration Rules and that the customer waived the right to have a court, other than a qualifying state court of limited jurisdiction, resolve covered disputes.
The letter states that the parties had discussed a planned motion to compel arbitration and that the court had set August 18, 2025, as the deadline for defendants to file that motion. Instead, the parties jointly asked the court to refer all claims to arbitration and stay the action. They proposed filing a joint status letter within seven days after arbitration ended.
Disposition
The provided text does not contain an order or other ruling by Judge Rakoff. It therefore does not state that the request was granted, denied, or otherwise resolved. The document records only the parties’ joint request.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.